There’s plenty to talk about in this movie, but too many people haven’t seen it yet and I don’t want to spoil it for them.
My experience in the theatre that night had me thinking that two more points should be added to the list that I started in the last post (Read “. . . Will We Watch?”). There, I suggested that we might consider having two standards regarding Language, violence and sexual content in movies. Movies that explore what it means to be human can have greater latitude for including this adult content, and a film that is just for entertainment, less so.
The principle is: language, violence and sexual content can be a means to an end, but not an end in themselves. To these I’d like to add the demonic and the stupid.
One of the films previewed before the feature presentation was Sinister. The preview scared me spitless. I cannot declare with certainty that this movie even has a demon in it, nor can I say with certainty that that this movie is using the demonic as entertainment. But, I think, based on the trailer, it’s likely.
Even if it’s not, I know that this type of movie is not good for me to see. This is a bit tangential, but an important point when it comes to movie viewing. Not everyone can view everything. For some, sexual content needs to be avoided as a matter of course. For others, this isn’t an issue, but violence is. For me, it’s the demonic.
Even though the demonic in The Exorcist is a means to an end, this type of content is something I avoid. Dicerning movie viewer need to know themselves.
The Exocist (1973) is such a film in that it deals with important themes and in many ways it affirms Christian understanding of reality. The presentation of the demonic was a means to an end, rather than an end in itself. This is more than can be said of the flood of “supernatural thrillers” that followed. Like sex, and violence, the demonic is not to be glorified or celebrated or simply exploited for entertainment purposes.
Nor is the stupid. I was reminded of this by Jeff Daniels.
Jeff Daniels plays the role of Abe in Looper. He also played Harry Dunne in Dumb and Dumber (1994). I admit some parts were pretty funny and a quite clever. This is probably one of the best in the genre—but it spawned a long string of movies that celebrate utter stupidity. Most fall far short of clever and don’t have the same level of talent (Daniel’s co-star was Jim Carrey).
These movies compensate for their lack of cleverness and comedic talent, with more stupidity and crudity. I’m not sure if it’s even possible to have stupidity as a means to an end. Maybe that’s why most of these movies are simply stupid, and because we can’t send them to their room for misbehaving, we can only ignore them and hope, that without an audience, they will stop.