Bill Maher sure doesn’t like it when religious people say that atheism is a religion.
In one sense, Maher is right; atheism is not a religion. Atheism doesn’t have any explicit rituals or holy texts, nor does it believe in a deity. When Maher restricts his definition of religion to “this looney stuff” he can safely declare that “atheism is a religion like abstinence is a sex position.”
Atheism is a Religion
But if we were to broaden the definition of religion to something like–people who have faith in something that can’t be proven rationally. Well, then it would be a little more legitimate to declare Maher a religious person because atheism is based on a belief that cannot be proven. It requires a leap of faith to accept the claim that the whole of reality is strictly material.There is no belief that does not begin with a claim that cannot be proven rationally--even the belief that matter is all their is.Click To Tweet
Maher claims it is only “idiots” who stand in the “grand intellectual tradition of ‘I know you are but what am I?'”–those who assert that atheism and theism are “two sides of the same coin.” But this isn’t exactly true. Fredrich Nietzsche, who on the continuum between idiocy and genius makes geniuses look like idiots, said exactly this.
If you watch Maher, you know that his ideal is an aggregate of equality, freedom of speech, science, democracy, etc.
Nietzsche would lump Maher and the Christians who drive him crazy into the same category. He said that, just like religion, the rationalism and scientific optimism celebrated by Maher, is another attempt to set up an ideal to which we might aspire.
There is nothing wrong with belief in meaning. Nietzsche said that human beings have a hard time flourishing without something to believe in. So it’s nothing to be ashamed of.
There are some pretty distinct lines between his “evidence-based belief” and my “faith-based malarkey” but it is not helpful to draw lines that don’t really exist.